Hi all,

I don't think my test qualifies to give a +1 due to needing a patch for my
unsupported toolchain, but otherwise it's successful.

 - LICENSE, NOTICE, README.md, DISCLAIMER-WIP present in both repositories.
 - Build for eZ80 requires a custom patch for a non-supported toolchain.
Patch adds support for clang-ez80 and ELF format.
 - Executes successfully on hardware.
 - Build size is 257,713 bytes in text, 197 bytes in rodata - tuned config
for 256KB flash.

-- 
bje

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 12:06 AM Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
> Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 RC0 has been staged under [1] and it's
> time to vote on accepting it for release. If approved we will seek
> final release approval from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr.
>
> A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 are
> required to pass.
>
> The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [3]
> "Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed
> source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting
> executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the
> package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
>
> A document to walk through some of this process has been published on
> our project wiki and can be found here [4].
>
> [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM
> items in [4])
> [ ] -1 reject (explanation required)
>
> Thank you all,
> Alin Jerpelea
>
> SCM Information:
>   Release tag: nuttx-10.1.0-RC0
>   Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag:
> f380c919f04d5ee88e0a83f5632cc83af503664f
>   Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag:
> 4348d91d1356335483089c3865282d80f13bedcd
>
> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/10.1.0-RC0/
> [2]
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-10.1.0-RC0/ReleaseNotes
> [3] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> [4]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release
>

Reply via email to