Maybe you could re-gain access Gregory manage users and put it in an "archived state" with a note that the project moved to Apache organization? :-)
That way nothing will be deleted, while note on new upstream will redirect users to a new place decreasing confusion. There is a chance that someone still may want to use current repository, or you may want to use it in future in that case "archiving" will prevent name / ownership takeover. Regarding kconfig-frontends I am in touch with Espressif and Debian maintainers, also contacted initial author Yann MORIN. Maybe putting this package into the Apache organization would be a good idea if possible..? Thanks :-) Tomek On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 4:11 PM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > No, https://github.com/NuttX/nuttx is just garbage and should be deleted. > It has nothing to do with Apache NuttX and I don't think anything has been > touched there in months. > > A thought was that this could be a place to keep GPL tools and applications > that are needed with NuttX but that are incompatible with the ASF project. > This is where a tool like kconfig-frontends could be supported, > > A problem now is that many people have access to the repository and it is > not under the control of any project. > > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 7:53 AM Tomasz CEDRO <to...@cedro.info> wrote: > > > Hello world :-) > > > > Another thing I found confusing a bit for a newcomer is the dual > > repository model: > > 1. https://github.com/NuttX/nuttx > > 2. https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx > > > > There is not information or redirect on 1 that development takes place on > > 2. > > > > Is 2 going to become 1 back again when incubation is complete? :-) > > > > -- > > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info > > -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
