Some tools(e.g. kconfig-frontend) are critical for NuttX, but in an unmaintained state, so we have to maintain our own version. Two options here:
1. Host on https://bitbucket.org/nuttx/, Greg needs to share the admin right to all PPMC/Commmiter member. 2. Host on https://github.com/NuttX/ <https://github.com/NuttX/nuttx>, Remove no PPMC/Commiter from admin group Either way is fine, but we need action now. I have seen the same topic happen on the email list many times, but nothing happens after that discussion. On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 1:26 AM Brennan Ashton <bash...@brennanashton.com> wrote: > Agreed it will just complicate things moving towards graduation. I had > asked for it to be taken down a long time ago. > > --Brennan > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021, 7:10 AM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > No, https://github.com/NuttX/nuttx is just garbage and should be > deleted. > > It has nothing to do with Apache NuttX and I don't think anything has > been > > touched there in months. > > > > A thought was that this could be a place to keep GPL tools and > applications > > that are needed with NuttX but that are incompatible with the ASF > project. > > This is where a tool like kconfig-frontends could be supported, > > > > A problem now is that many people have access to the repository and it is > > not under the control of any project. > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 7:53 AM Tomasz CEDRO <to...@cedro.info> wrote: > > > > > Hello world :-) > > > > > > Another thing I found confusing a bit for a newcomer is the dual > > > repository model: > > > 1. https://github.com/NuttX/nuttx > > > 2. https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx > > > > > > There is not information or redirect on 1 that development takes place > on > > > 2. > > > > > > Is 2 going to become 1 back again when incubation is complete? :-) > > > > > > -- > > > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info > > > > > >
