> >> Should be nice if we could find a wait to instruct the compiler (or >> the building system) to include the typedefed CODE to the pointer >> functions automatically, but I don't know if it is possible. >> >> I think you are all making risky irresponsible changes to fix something > that is not broken. >
Also, I don't think that you can assume that a pointed-at function resides in code ROM. Couldn't it also reside in RAM? I could imagine having FAR function pointers and CODE function pointers and we should not limit the support. > >
