On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 7:54 PM Alan Rosenthal <alan.rosent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi! > > What needs to be done to open the discussion to consider changing the > rules? > > Also please see a very detailed comment on the github issue here by > @robertlipe: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/issues/6896#issuecomment-1227971503 > Basically what Greg said: motivate someone of the PPMC to call a vote. Just FYI, based on what Byron points out with regard to the Zilog families needing C89 (and possibly other archs that weren't mentioned), I would probably vote -1 unless either: 1) there is a toolchain, which is complete (not "experimental") that supports these platforms, or: 2) someone can convince me that no one cares about these architectures anymore, such as if it's shown that NuttX already contains significant breakage on these platforms that prevents them from working anyway, no one has complained, and it has gone unfixed for several years If 1 or 2 (or both) I'm okay with it. But if changing the rules will leave users in the dust, then I'm not okay with it. Just my thoughts... I'll be glad to hear the thoughts of others. Cheers, Nathan
