Hi,
Also voting to let as-is
One more reason to keep the OS code under the "nuttx" name without some
sort of suffix: this is the main name of the project, and has been for
years.
When you want to clone this repo from a command line, you dont want to
go check on github if this is nuttx-core nuttx-main nuttx-foobar or
nuttx-whatever. This is just nuttx.
Minor reason but for day-to-day usability it could be useful to many
people :)
Sebastien
Le 20/11/2022 à 21:09, Alin Jerpelea a écrit :
+1 let is as it is :)
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022, 20:23 Tomek CEDRO, <to...@cedro.info> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 8:20 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
On 11/20/2022 1:18 PM, Tim Hardisty wrote:
Might I humbly suggest that "if it isn't broken, don't fix it"?
Just stick with the names already in use (minus the incubator, as will
happen anyway). Just tried searching the Apache website for "RTOS" and
NuttX is top of the list; searching the Apache GitHub repositories
similarly and NuttX is the only repo that comes up.
If it does go to a vote, you can guess what mine will be for :)
...
After flip-flopping for a couple of days, I have come to the same
conclusion as well.
+1 :-) :-) :-)
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
