*yet again* it is the proof that multiplying the channels of
communication just dilutes them.
Anything considered a breaking change requiring the use of explicit doc
in the next release SHOULD be discussed here openly.
The commit was approved by David, OK, and, again, xiaomi.
This is not exactly several members.
I read that the last comment was "Thanks for your suggestion! I will try
to enhance the compatibility in different shell environment." but it has
still be committed.
Sebastien
On 3/7/23 14:22, alin.jerpe...@sony.com wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
The commit 03b164f59ce40a3f5677b0588af2aee8d9697bf6 tools/makefile: silent all
compile output
It has been reviewed and approved by several members
https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/8378
Best regards
Alin
-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastien Lorquet <sebast...@lorquet.fr>
Sent: den 7 mars 2023 14:12
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build system is broken
Hi,
Do your realize how counter-intuitive this is?
I would have NEVER imagined that V=0 is not the exact contrary of V=1!
Can this silent mode be made optional in a config setting please? It is really
a non-feature. it's just a fantasy to please some committer, and should have
never been accepted imho.
When I want to contribute a one liner to submit a new flash chip I get forced
to wait 48 hours for useless automatic tests that will not even compile my new
code, and such profound changes gets integrated immediately with almost no
review other than an automatic build. I know it because some commits do not
have corresponding pull requests.
This gives a feeling of double standard that does not seem in line with the
inviolables of this project.
Tomek: Thanks, but I am not interested in workarounds that look like
"here is a way to avoid asking why a change was made".
Sebastien
On 3/7/23 13:45, Nathan Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 7:23 AM Tomek CEDRO <to...@cedro.info> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 9:24 AM Sebastien Lorquet wrote:
No
V=1 is an entirely different thing.
I dont want to see the output mangled with tons of arm-none-eabi-gcc
command lines.
This stuff is another breakage
Sebastien
There is V=0 which gives the same output as before.
It needs to be documented somehow, and in a way that people will see it, or
we will get a lot of complaints and questions about it after the next
release.
Nathan
