Hi Lwazi, Thank you very much taking time to test it and confirming that it is not working.
BTW, by working I mean "ble scanning" was working. I think we need some better application example on NuttX to test BLE. AFAIK our stack is too limited currently. BR, Alan On 3/10/23, Lwazi Dube <lwa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Alan, > If it is working on other platforms, no problem, I will fix my devices > later if I get a chance. I will put some details here in case someone > with my setup runs into the same issue. > After posting my message I downloaded 9.0.0 and 10.0.0 and tested the > releases (9 works and 10 is broken). Here is an example of what works > on my local build. I have two devices running an old NuttX build: > ----------------------------- > commit 28ac578cd325536e0fbe8eaeebba524827d0e3a6 (origin/master, > origin/HEAD, master) > Author: Gregory Nutt <gn...@nuttx.org> > Date: Sat May 18 15:18:06 2019 -0600 > > Update ReleaseNotes in preparation for the 7.30 release. > ------------------------------ > > I use one device to control the other. Let us call them HOST and > TARGET. TARGET has some BLE services in it: heart rate, current time, > battery etc. The original Intel source has a sample. I use HOST to > interrogate TARGET knowing what value to expect. Replace > XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX with the BDAddr found by the " > bt bnep0 info" command. > > NuttShell (NSH) > nsh> bt bnep0 gatt connect XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX public > Connect pending... > nsh> btnet_hci_connected: Connected > bt bnep0 gatt discover XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX public 0x180d > Discovered 1 handles: > 0. handle 0x0006 perm: 01 > nsh> > > When I update to the latest NuttX (or anything newer than 9.0.0) this > does not work. The connect command hangs, presumably in the serial > driver, since you say bt works on other platforms. > > Regards, > Lwazi > > On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 07:27, Alan C. Assis <acas...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Lwazi, >> >> I don't know about CC2564, but BLE Stack was working recently to >> ESP32, ESP32C3, nRF52, etc >> >> Is it related to this issue: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/8767 >> >> BR, >> >> Alan >> >> On 3/9/23, Lwazi Dube <lwa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 at 13:16, Alan C. Assis <acas...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Welcome back go NuttX Lwazi (I'm not been sarcastic, I'm happy to hear >> >> from you again! You have a great knowledge of BLE can we need! I was >> >> expecting you to share that working example of BLE application using >> >> our BLE stack). >> >> >> > Thanks, I don't know about "great knowledge", but I am not sure I will >> > be doing any bt work this time. I checked. The current BLE stack is >> > broken when I run it on my board with a cc2564 BT chip. The bt command >> > fails to connect like it does on a 2019 tree that I have. I don't know >> > what the point of the changes being made to bluetooth is, if such a >> > basic feature remains broken after a merge. Is anyone really using or >> > testing the NuttX stack? >> > >
