Hello Alan, Thank you for your reply, I have opened a new issue in github. You can find it here: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/11292
best, Hakeem ________________________________ From: Raja, Mayank <mayank.r...@brooksautomation.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2023 10:21 AM To: Giydan, Hakeem <hakeem.giy...@brooksautomation.com> Subject: FW: Networking Delay: SO_SNDTIMEO odd behavior -----Original Message----- From: Alan C. Assis <acas...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2023 12:58 AM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Cc: Raja, Mayank <mayank.r...@brooksautomation.com> Subject: Re: Networking Delay: SO_SNDTIMEO odd behavior [External Email] Hi Hakeem, Thank you very much for reporting an issue your team found. Could you please open an issue with more information at https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues and supply a little bit more information (board/mcu used, version of NuttX, host OS, etc). Please also supply your board config (run "make savedefconfig" and attach the defconfig generated). I think probably some higher priority thread/task is getting all CPU for some time. If you are using an ARM MCU then you can use Segger SystemView (enable the RTT driver on NuttX) to see what is happening when that 1s delay. We don't have an official documentation about it yet, but this discussion here could help: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/10556 Alternatively if you can use an all open-source solution, you can use ORBTrace as explained here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_k1f4F2JVBA Best Regards, Alan On 11/27/23, Giydan, Hakeem <hakeem.giy...@brooks.com> wrote: > Hello, > > we are using Nuttx on our Robot Control Boards, and we are seeing an > odd behavior when communicating with our main board that is running Linux. > > Every once in a while, we see a more than a 1 second delay when we > call Socket::Send to send information to the Main board. Using Debug > Statement, I confirmed that we are calling Socket::Send in a timely > manner. Also. by using WireShark, I can confirm that the message does > not get sent out until more than a 1 second later. > > Strangely, after adding an option to the socket for a 300ms send Delay > "SO_SNDTIMEO", we don't see the Delay in communication anymore. Also > Strangely, we reduce the timeout to 1us and we don't see any timeout > happening in the socket. > > > Why would adding "SO_SNDTIMEO" remove the once in a while delay we > were seeing and why after setting the timeout to 1us we are not seeing > the timeout error? > > best, > Hakeem > > > _____________________________________________________________________ > > This email message, including any attachments, may contain > confidential and proprietary information for the sole use of the > intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please > notify the sender and delete this message from your system, without > making any copy or distribution. Our website and email privacy policy > is available at https://www.brooks.com/privacy > _____________________________________________________________________ This email message, including any attachments, may contain confidential and proprietary information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete this message from your system, without making any copy or distribution. Our website and email privacy policy is available at https://www.brooks.com/privacy
