On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 at 11:43, raiden00pl <raiden0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't know what was the initial intention about `drivers/`, only Greg can > answer this question. > But what I see now is that `drivers/` implement `upper-half` drivers, and > arch specific drivers implement "lower-half" drivers (there are probably a > few exceptions > to this rule). > For this reason, polluting `drivers/` with "lower-half" implementations > seems bad for me > and I think arch specific 'lower-half' drivers should be somewhere in > `arch/` (`arch/common/<chip_name>`, > `arch/drivers/<chip_name>` ?) > Thanks. I would go with arch/drivers.
