Hi,

If help with code review is still needed, I'd like to volunteer for that work. 
I can help with changes that touch arm64, risc-v and especially the memory 
protected modes (CONFIG_BUILD_KERNEL) / address environments.

You might know me as pussuw on Github.

Br,
Ville Juven


________________________________
From: Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, September 6, 2024 3:23 AM
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org <dev@nuttx.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Help wanted!

Hello Matteo,

Thanks! I don't think we have documentation on exactly how to review PRs.
Right now, I guess it's just a process of picking a PR, reviewing the code,
commenting on any issues that might be found, etc. I guess it's just using
your best judgment and if in doubt, feel free to ask on list!

Cheers
Nathan

On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 9:24 AM Matteo Golin <matteo.go...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Nathan,
>
> I'd be interested in helping out where I can. Is there a list of
> steps/processes that normally go into a PR review so that I could reference
> something while reviewing to make sure I don't miss anything important? Or
> is the review process more on a per-PR basis of deciding what to check and
> how much testing should be done?
>
> Matteo
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 7:27 AM Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Help wanted:
> >
> > The number of open PRs is usually around 80-90, but recently that
> > jumped to around 150-160!!
> >
> > Only a few people are reviewing PRs, so the backlog is likely to
> > continue growing.
> >
> > We need your help with reviewing!
> >
> > Also, if you have open PRs that are not ready for review, please
> > consider marking them as "Draft" to help the reviewers focus on PRs
> > that are ready.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Nathan
> >
>

Reply via email to