<< /usr/bin/bash: line 1: genromfs: command not found >> Hi Alin: That's very odd, genromfs is inside the Docker Image so it shouldn't fail (unless we're running outside Docker?). Here's how we check genromfs:
## This will show "genromfs 0.5.2" sudo docker run -it \ ghcr.io/apache/nuttx/apache-nuttx-ci-linux:latest \ /bin/bash -c "genromfs -h" Also spresense:elf builds OK on my Ubuntu PC: https://gist.github.com/nuttxpr/8a203426383b84626c8a5bd06168bf9b#file-ci-arm-01-log-L359 Could you try this (from my article) and lemme know if it works? Thanks! ## Compile Target Group arm-01, including spresense/elf job=arm-01 sudo docker run -it \ ghcr.io/apache/nuttx/apache-nuttx-ci-linux:latest \ /bin/bash -c " cd ; pwd ; git clone https://github.com/apache/nuttx ; git clone https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps apps ; pushd nuttx ; echo NuttX Source: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/tree/\$(git rev-parse HEAD) ; popd ; pushd apps ; echo NuttX Apps: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/tree/\$(git rev-parse HEAD) ; popd ; sleep 10 ; cd nuttx/tools/ci ; (./cibuild.sh -c -A -N -R testlist/$job.dat || echo '***** BUILD FAILED') ; " Lup On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 10:01 AM Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Lup > I started the test and I found a fiew issues > > Configuration/Tool: spresense/elf,CONFIG_ARM_TOOLCHAIN_GNU_EABI > 2024-10-28 02:49:20 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Cleaning... > Configuring... > Disabling CONFIG_ARM_TOOLCHAIN_GNU_EABI > Enabling CONFIG_ARM_TOOLCHAIN_GNU_EABI > Building NuttX... > /usr/bin/bash: line 1: genromfs: command not found > make[3]: *** [Makefile:81: > /awork/nuttx/NuttX/farm/apps/examples/elf/tests/romfs.img] Error 127 > make[3]: Target 'all' not remade because of errors. > make[2]: *** [Makefile:59: build] Error 2 > make[2]: Target 'all' not remade because of errors. > make[1]: *** [Makefile:52: /awork/nuttx/NuttX/farm/apps/examples/elf_all] > Error 2 > make[1]: Target 'all' not remade because of errors. > make: *** [tools/LibTargets.mk:232: /awork/nuttx/NuttX/farm/apps/libapps.a] > Error 2 > make: Target 'all' not remade because of errors. > /awork/nuttx/NuttX/farm/nuttx/tools/testbuild.sh: line 385: > /awork/nuttx/NuttX/farm/nuttx/../nuttx/nuttx.manifest: No such file or > directory > Normalize spresense/elf > > Configuration/Tool: spresense/posix_spawn,CONFIG_ARM_TOOLCHAIN_GNU_EABI > 2024-10-28 02:51:17 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Cleaning... > Configuring... > Disabling CONFIG_ARM_TOOLCHAIN_GNU_EABI > Enabling CONFIG_ARM_TOOLCHAIN_GNU_EABI > Building NuttX... > /usr/bin/bash: line 1: genromfs: command not found > make[3]: *** [Makefile:50: > /awork/nuttx/NuttX/farm/apps/examples/posix_spawn/filesystem/romfs.img] > Error 127 > make[3]: Target 'all' not remade because of errors. > make[2]: *** [Makefile:47: build] Error 2 > make[2]: Target 'all' not remade because of errors. > make[1]: *** [Makefile:52: > /awork/nuttx/NuttX/farm/apps/examples/posix_spawn_all] Error 2 > make[1]: Target 'all' not remade because of errors. > make: *** [tools/LibTargets.mk:232: /awork/nuttx/NuttX/farm/apps/libapps.a] > Error 2 > make: Target 'all' not remade because of errors. > /awork/nuttx/NuttX/farm/nuttx/tools/testbuild.sh: line 385: > /awork/nuttx/NuttX/farm/nuttx/../nuttx/nuttx.manifest: No such file or > directory > Normalize spresense/posix_spawn > > Can you please take a look > > Best regards > > On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 11:47 PM Lee, Lup Yuen <lu...@appkaki.com> wrote: > > > << 1) Regarding the script that uploads CI results to github gists: will > > this > > work for anyone who runs the docker image? If not, what should be done > with > > the results? >> > > > > Thanks Nathan! I'm using GitHub Gists as a simple way to push our Build > > Logs to the cloud for further processing and alerting. (There might be a > > better way) > > > > I'm running my Build Server logged in as the `nuttxpr` GitHub Account > (via > > `gh login auth`), so all Gists will be published under the `nuttxpr` > > account. Someone who runs the Docker Image will probably create a new > > GitHub Account to publish the Gists: https://gist.github.com/nuttxpr > > > > What we need next: A script that will (1) Consolidate the Gists > > across Multiple GitHub Accounts (2) Scan the Build Logs for Errors and > > Warnings (3) Alert somebody. > > > > << 2) Is there a way to detect (like a GPIO rising or falling edge, for > > lack > > of a better description) that a build that previously succeeded is > failing, > > or a build that was previously failing succeeds again, to notify only > about > > targets that change status? >> > > > > We have a problem: There doesn't seem to be an easy to scan our Build > Logs > > for Errors and Warnings: > > https://lupyuen.codeberg.page/articles/ci2.html#find-errors-and-warnings > > > > We should implement this Log Scanning in the script that I mentioned > > earlier. Then we can detect Failed Builds and alert somebody. Maybe > through > > open-source Prometheus + Grafana: > > https://lupyuen.github.io/articles/prometheus > > > > << 3) Regarding M1 macs not being able to run the CI builds, I suggest to > > state that as a call to action, e.g., help wanted to make the build > succeed > > on M1 macs, please see such-and-such issue on github... >> > > > > Yep I'll post an Issue at our NuttX Repo. I'll explain what happens when > I > > run the CI Build on my M2 Mac. Thanks! > > > > Lup > > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 12:15 AM Nathan Hartman < > hartman.nat...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Nice article Lup! Thank you. A few questions: > > > > > > 1) Regarding the script that uploads CI results to github gists: will > > this > > > work for anyone who runs the docker image? If not, what should be done > > with > > > the results? > > > > > > 2) Is there a way to detect (like a GPIO rising or falling edge, for > lack > > > of a better description) that a build that previously succeeded is > > failing, > > > or a build that was previously failing succeeds again, to notify only > > about > > > targets that change status? > > > > > > 3) Regarding M1 macs not being able to run the CI builds, I suggest to > > > state that as a call to action, e.g., help wanted to make the build > > succeed > > > on M1 macs, please see such-and-such issue on github... > > > > > > Otherwise looks good and thanks again! > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Nathan > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 6:08 PM Lee, Lup Yuen <lu...@appkaki.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > Refurbished Ubuntu PCs have become quite affordable. Can we turn them > > > into > > > > a (Low-Cost) Build Farm for NuttX? > > > > > > > > In this article we… > > > > (1) Compile NuttX for a group of Arm32 Boards > > > > (2) Then scale up and compile NuttX for All Arm32 Boards > > > > (3) Thanks to the Docker Image provided by NuttX > > > > (4) Why do this? Because GitHub Actions taught us a Painful Lesson: > > > > Freebies Won’t Last Forever! > > > > > > > > Check out the article: > https://lupyuen.codeberg.page/articles/ci2.html > > > > > > > > Lup > > > > > > > > > >
