On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 12:31 PM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 11/5/2024 9:18 PM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > > does that GCC have int64_t? > Yes, according to include/nuttx/compiler.h. > > > >> zNEO (z16) and z8 are no long supportable without ZDS-II. Other z80s > >> don't work with common small compilers like SDCC anymore. > > i guess people who care these targets should express what they want > > wrt this time_t discussion. > > eg. > > * drop 32-bit time_t and leave these targets broken > > * keep uint32_t time_t as a user-visible option > > * make it depend on CONFIG_HAVE_LONG_LONG or such > > * something else? > > There is no usable toolchain for these CPUs.
i suppose they still want to fix the situation sooner or later. either by fixing the toolchains and/or nuttx. right? i guess their opinions on this topic are particularly important because the rest of the community is probably ok with unconditional int64_t time_t.
