On 2025-01-31 13:48:32, Tomek CEDRO wrote: > On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 1:41 PM Sebastien Lorquet <sebast...@lorquet.fr> > wrote: > > Of course I also tried with the commit before that one, and it didnt > > work either. > > Sebastien, did you try the release packages? Does the problem occur in > the release packages? > > Upstream master is for development purposes, things may get broken for > a while, I would never put my product on a master branch. This is offloading responsibility to end user. Sebastian is right here. Either apps are separated properly so that even 1 year old apps repo will work with current HEAD of rtos, or nuttx should have sync mechanism like submodules (don't go there) or tool like Zephyr's west to sync it (or it can also be done with make/cmake).
Did you ever try to bisect problem in nuttx? Constant failures in apps and you have to manually guess which commit is going to at least compile - and then you still cannot be 100% sure soft does/doesn't work as indended. -- .-----------------.-------------------.----------------------.-----------------. | Michal Lyszczek | Embedded C, Linux | Company Address | .-. opensource | | +48 727 564 419 | Software Engineer | Akacjowa 10a; 55-330 | oo| supporter | | https://bofc.pl `----.--------------: Brzezinka Sredzka PL | /`'\ & | | GPG FF1EBFE7E3A974B1 | Bits of Code | NIP: 813 349 58 78 |(\_;/) programer | `----------------------^--------------^----------------------^-----------------'
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
