Hello,
Fine, I have no opposition, and yes it could become actually useful.
As Tomek noticed, we also need to document what it is so it has an
impact on many docs, and also on the website.
Sebastien
On 12/02/2025 12:11, Alin Jerpelea wrote:
If we a gree to provide SBOM for our releases:
a source SBOM (json file) file will be provided together with the download
link and will provide insight on our fill source code and license
a build SBOM (json file) will be generated after a build containing only
the code that was compiled on that device
@Sebastien Lorquet <sebast...@lorquet.fr> I understand your neutral
position since you don't use SBOM but if we prepare for 2026 I think that
we should
support SBOM to help our users Comply with the EU and international
requirements.
Best regards
Alin
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025, 11:35 Sebastien Lorquet, <sebast...@lorquet.fr> wrote:
Hello
I have an absolutely neutral position on this issue.
We dont use sboms.
but maybe in some future we might be required to provide it. However I
dont have any clue of that happening in the near or mid future.
What does it look like? It's just a static file somewhere, right?
Sebastien
On 11/02/2025 10:53, Alin Jerpelea wrote:
Hi all,
I have been working on a SBOM implementation for our project and I think
that we are getting ready top provide both source and build SBOMS like
Zephyt.
What is your opinion about SBOM?
Would an SBOM help you and your company?
Best regards
Alin
