> > > > The last sentence is completely wrong. Its not about "preference" but > > impacting self-compatibility and long term maintenance. Messing the > > foundations and defaults is not innovation. Try building a home when > > the project constantly changes during the process, when you have 10 > > floors ready and suddenly you need to change pavements. Innovation is > > when you create new functionality and give users a choice without > > breaking existing working stuff.
So you think it's more important to maintain your current 10 floors building, and it's none of your business if a 100 floors skyscraper appears in the future? so could you afford all the developer time spent on this kind of problem? BRs,
