Unfortunately the way the file is named for GitHub to detect it requires it to be called "code owners". But we would not be using it as true "owners", rather as a manifest of which reviewers should be requested for changes to certain files.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 5:36 PM Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 2:58 PM Tomek CEDRO <to...@cedro.info> wrote: > > > 4. Code owners, we tried, maybe we should retry. I like the idea that > > if someone contributes somewhere that means they have insight and will > > help others so they will be assigned to "ownership" based on git > > history :-) > > > > Hmm, "code owners" implies only the owner can make changes, others will be > afraid to contribute. Maybe "code experts" instead? The more you contribute > to an area, the more expert you are likely to be there! > > Nathan >
