>From Documentation, only MnemoFS has support to it: https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/components/filesystem/mnemofs.html
I didn't verify the source code for others FS. Talking about FS, I just found this site with Documentation about NuttX tmpfs: https://www.openeuler.org/en/blog/wangshuo/Introduction%20to%20NuttX%20tmpfs/Introduction_to_NuttX_tmpfs Then searching about NuttX there I discovered about UniProton, that used the Device Driver model from NuttX (adapted) https://docs.openeuler.org/en/docs/24.03_LTS_SP2/embedded/uniproton/uniproton_functions.html BR, Alan On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 5:13 PM Gregory Nutt <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think most of the file systems implement file timestamps either > (unless that has changed). > > > On 9/23/25 13:47, Tim Hardisty wrote: > > Thanks Alan - that explains why ls -l doesn't show the timestamps. > > > > So I still need to find out why the LittleFS files don't have a > > timestamp. > > > > On 23/09/2025 20:15, Alan C. Assis wrote: > >> Hi Tim, > >> > >> AFAIK the LS command on NuttX never displayed the date/timestamp. > >> > >> Probably it needs to be implemented at apps/nshlib/nsh_fscmds.c in the > >> ls_handler() function. > >> > >> I just opened an issue about it: > >> https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/17063 > >> > >> Other similar missing feature is the multi user support to control file > >> access: > >> https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/10896 > >> > >> BR, > >> > >> Alan > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 12:26 PM Tim Hardisty <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> I send syslog output to an MTD formatted with LittleFS. The syslog > >>> output itself has correct timestamps from my board's RTC, but I must be > >>> doing something dumb either with NuttX or LittleFS as the syslog file > >>> itself has a default timestamp of 21st January 1970 regardless of > >>> when a > >>> new file is created. > >>> > >>> And an 'ls -l' at NSH doesn't show timestamps either? > >>> > >>> Can someone advise? I'm sure I'm not doing something REALLY obvious!! > >>> > >>> PS - same is true of a LittleFS formatted EEPROM device too, and also > >>> for a FAT formatted ramdisk... > >>> > >>> >
