Yes, that is a good idea, I remember Mateusz did it during the process to migrate Confluence pages to Doc RST.
This way we can track which pages still need to be created. If you look at https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/applications/index.html you will see almost all apps have pages, but almost all are empty pages. BR, Alan On Fri, Nov 7, 2025 at 6:25 AM Michal Lenc <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for this, I think the wording of these points is a good compromise. > > Btw, perhaps we could summarize what documentation pages we are missing. > GitHub issue would be the best place for this? > > Michal > > On 11/6/25 20:58, Alan C. Assis wrote: > > As discussed in [1] we need to improve our Documentation and requesting > > Documentation from the author of the new added Features seems to be the > > best approach. > > > > So these are the proposals to be voted: > > > > - Anyone submitting a new features should write Documentation to it, > which > > he/she is the author is knows more about that features than other people > > and could write better Documentation; > > > > - Anyone adding a new function (or a new resource such as ioctl, etc) > > should include it in the existing Documentation; If there is not > > Documentation for that Feature/Driver/whatever, then the Reviews should > > suggest the contributor to submit a basic page (without forcing him to do > > it) > > > > I think these are the key points collected from the previous discussion. > > > > BR, > > > > Alan > > > > 1 - https://lists.apache.org/thread/5dklb9r2k9vpl9jwpromdn0lcv3h0985 > > > >
