On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 9:03 PM raiden00pl <[email protected]> wrote: > It's become quite a mess here, starting with the thread titled VOTE > without DISCUSSION :) The title also suggests that the lack of > POSIX compliance in NuttX is something new, which is not true. > > We've touched two separate topics here that I think deserve > their own separate discussion. The first topic: should we introduce > an option to disable signal support, similar to how we currently > disable pthreads or POSIX timers? Both options are not > POSIX-compliant, but are useful for small systems and they > have been in NuttX for a long time. > > The second topic is support for POSIX subprofiles (like PSE51), > but this is the topic for later.
Allright I have created separate mailing list threads lets move the party over there :D -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
