Hi Tomek & Alin, That pretty much sums up my thoughts as well.
Cheers, Nathan On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 1:23 AM Alin Jerpelea <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Tomek, > > I think that having different profiles is a good idea. > > Users can balance between size and features while still being POSIX > compliant > > This change does not conflict with our inviolables and provides flexibility > > Best regards > Alin > > On Fri, 21 Nov 2025, 02:00 Tomek CEDRO, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello world :-) > > > > Coming from a mailing thread [1] lets discuss Alan's idea to create > > POSIX Profiles in NuttX, something similar to Zephyr's solution [2], > > that will assure POSIX Compliance but also allow trimming firmware > > size for hardware / memory limited small and tiny MCUs. > > > > Alan's idea is to introduce a dedicated POSIX PE51 profile. POSIX > > PSE51 is a specific, minimal profile or subset of the full POSIX - > > Portable Operating System Interface standard, formally defined in IEEE > > 1003.13-2003. > > > > Thanks :-) > > Tomek > > > > [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg13936.html > > [2] > > > https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/main/lib/posix/Kconfig.profile > > > > -- > > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info > > >
