On Sat, Nov 29, 2025 at 7:52 PM spudaneco <[email protected]> wrote: > The traditional driver interface is defined in the POSIX standard and must be > preserved in any case. My naive understanding is that uORB buils on the > traditional, standard driver interface. True?Sent from my Galaxy
>From what I understand uORB provides common interface for all sensors at application level, so sensors can be easily exchanged and still provide relevant data in the same format with no need to convert raw data by the user each time different sensor is used? So this brings some sort of standard in ready to use results from sensors.. and this works on existing drivers architecture.. except it involves floating point data as for now which may be problematic on some platforms thus the idea to also provide fixed point sensor data? I did not use it myself yet thus my questions :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
