Hello Pierre,

I believe you've been suggested to use the unsubscribe link on the NuttX
website already and that didn't work (correct me if I'm wrong).

At this point, I suggest you block the NuttX mailing list address from your
email client.

On Tue, Feb 3, 2026, 10:17 AM Pierre-Noel Bouteville <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Some one can remove m’y e-mail from this list ?
> Pierre-Noël Bouteville
> Envoyé de mon iPhone
>
> > Le 3 févr. 2026 à 16:10, Sebastien Lorquet <[email protected]> a
> écrit :
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I think NO AI in my nuttx. But I fully know that the addiction is
> strong, and it cannot be verified what developers do in their corners.
> >
> > So their own developer responsibility in reviewing and avoiding slop
> code applies.
> >
> >
> > HOWEVER, that said:
> >
> > It should be totally forbidden to loose precious maintainers time with
> slop pull request.
> >
> > You're very few and very busy and you should not be trolled with slop.
> >
> >
> > I think nuttx should be as rigorous as curl with respect to bogus and
> low value ai pull requests and bug reports.
> >
> >
> > Sebastien
> >
> >
> >> On 2/3/26 16:04, Matteo Golin wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> This week in particular there has been a large number of AI-generated
> pull
> >> requests submitted to NuttX and NuttX apps. Most of these used AI to
> >> completely generate PR descriptions and/or commit messages. In some
> cases,
> >> AI was used to generate documentation and possibly code.
> >>
> >> The quality of these PRs are low, containing unnecessary information
> that
> >> summarized the diffs (i.e. files changed, lines inserted, etc) and
> >> repetitive summaries. The dangerous aspect of these PRs is that the vast
> >> majority of them contained completely generated test claims with no logs
> >> (and in some cases, generated logs) to back them. When asked about the
> test
> >> claims, the authors stated that the PR was AI-generated and removed all
> >> claims.
> >>
> >> This is starting to become a trend, with a lot of recent PRs containing
> the
> >> same "files changed" section. They are difficult to review because they
> >> don't communicate the changes clearly, have unnecessary information and
> >> often contain fabricated information. Some of them contain multiple
> commits
> >> which should be reviewed split across multiple PRs and change summaries
> >> which omit information about commits. PR authors are also refusing to
> >> provide logs or adequate explanations in some cases.
> >>
> >> I think it's time for the community to discuss a stance on AI generated
> >> submissions. I don't think it's enforceable to prevent contributors from
> >> using AI in their PRs, and some contributors may be using it to assist
> them
> >> in a moderate way (I personally do not think any AI use is good, but I
> know
> >> this is not realistic for many people). I think that PRs which contain
> AI
> >> generated descriptions or code should be blocked by a change request
> until
> >> they are modified to improve the code quality or description quality.
> This
> >> isn't really a change, that's what we do with poor code submissions.
> >> However, I think contributors should be warned to stop using AI output
> if
> >> they are not verifying it, and there should be a stance from NuttX in
> the
> >> contributing guidelines regarding AI usage/guidelines. If it becomes a
> >> pattern for certain contributors I think their PRs should start getting
> >> closed.
> >>
> >> What does the community think?
> >>
> >> Matteo
> >>
> >> Here are some of these AI PRs:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3381
> >> https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3397
> >> https://github.com/apache/ <https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/18223
> >nuttx
> >> <https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/18223>/pull/18223
> >> <https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/18223>
> >> https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/18266
> >> https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/18221
> >> https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/18219
> >> https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/18217
> >> https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/18216
> >> https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/18205
> >> https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/18207
> >>
>

Reply via email to