Hi BILAL, Sounds good! Please open on github Discuss Issue about your proposal.
BR, Alan On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 5:22 PM BILAL EL <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alan, hi NuttX devs, > > I initially looked at the WireGuard project, but I am now considering > the TinyGL support on NuttX idea instead. > > I checked the current public NuttX GSoC discussion issues and I did not > find an active gsoc2026 discussion thread specifically for TinyGL. Before I > open one and finalize a proposal direction, I wanted to confirm whether > that is the > right next step. > > My background is mainly systems work in Rust/C++, Linux, and > constrained-system software. I am currently working on TrackOne, a > verifiable telemetry ledger for timestamped sensing and actuation events in > constrained environments, so I am most comfortable with low-level > integration work and incremental bring-up on embedded targets. > > For TinyGL, my first instinct would be to keep scope practical: > - port TinyGL cleanly into NuttX > - validate rendering on one reproducible target first > - provide a small demo workload > - document build, integration, and current limitations > > A few questions before I proceed: > - Should I open a dedicated GitHub discussion issue for TinyGL? > - Is there a preferred target board or simulator for this project? > - For GSoC scope, is the main goal a usable baseline TinyGL port, or do > you also expect a concrete demo application stack on top of it? > > Best, > Bilal El Khatabi > [email protected] > https://github.com/bilalobe >
