Thanks, I'll check them out. Le mer. 18 mars 2026 à 17:44, Alan C. Assis <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Hi BILAL, > > Nice to know you also are interested on this project, keep in mind there > is already a candidate interested on it: > https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/18548 > > Please open a discussion Issue there about it. > > Also if you please to get some other project the list is there: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/GSoC+2026+Ideas+list > > You can consult which projects already have candidates by looking here: > > https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20label%3Agsoc2026 > > There are already two implementations that I listed at the Apache page > that could be analyzed (a for Arduino and other for ESP32). > > BR, > > Alan > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 2:09 PM BILAL EL <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear Alan and NuttX developers, >> >> I am preparing a GSoC 2026 proposal for the “Wireguard port to NuttX” >> project and wanted to check scope and expectations before I submit. >> >> My background is in systems programming and constrained-environment >> software, with most of my current work centered around Rust, low-level >> reliability, and infrastructure for embedded or disconnected settings. I am >> particularly interested in this project because it combines embedded >> networking, security, and practical systems integration rather than just >> application-layer work. >> >> My current plan is to scope the project around: >> - a maintainable NuttX integration for WireGuard >> - successful interoperability with a standard Linux WireGuard peer >> - validation on at least one reproducible board or simulator target >> - documentation and repeatable test steps for the community >> >> Before finalizing the proposal, I would appreciate guidance on three >> points: >> - which board or simulation target you would most prefer for >> development and validation (eabi) >> - whether there is already a preferred reference implementation or >> prior experiment I should study first >> - what you would consider the minimum acceptable deliverable for a >> successful GSoC outcome >> >> If useful, I can also share my draft proposal text for feedback. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Bilal El Khatabi >> [email protected] >> https://github.com/bilalobe >> >
