I agree on what Xiao said. IMHO the human is always reposible for the code, regardless of the tools used. Adding tags about the code creation tools doesn't seem to add any valuable info. The code needs to be good quality and the responsibility is on the author anyhow.
Having said that, I don't strongly oppose adding thise tags, it just looks useless to me. Xiang Xiao kirjoitti perjantai 3. heinäkuuta 2026: > Actually, I don't care the code is created by humans or LLM, all patches > are equal to me and must pass my quality bar before I approve it. > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2026 at 2:44 PM Xiang Xiao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Whether or how a developer uses AI is a personal decision. What I am > > against is creating a rule to forbid the patch the developer generated with > > AI. > > > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2026 at 2:33 PM Michał Łyszczek <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> On 2026-07-02 18:54:44, Sebastien Lorquet wrote: > >> > Everything about "ai" is wrong and problematic, even if you want to > >> tolerate > >> > one aspect, it stays unacceptaoone has asked me either, but I 100% > >> agree with those. > >> > > >> > -quality is unacceptable, > >> > > >> > -environnemental impact is unacceptable > >> > > >> > -ethics are unacceptable > >> > > >> > -it is completely unsustainable on the financial and industrial levels > >> > > >> > -above all, it renders humans incapable and addicted to a centralized > >> system > >> > owned by billionaires > >> > > >> > -it destroys communities and cultures > >> > >> Noone has asked me, but I agree with Sebastian here and I am rather > >> against using LLMs myself too. > >> > >> I don't like that my code is used by corporations to create their product > >> any > >> money that they use to addict you to the tech. It's one thing when a > >> human reads > >> my GPL code and uses very similar code to implement something in the > >> company. He > >> did benefit from it somehow, he got smarter, maybe he saved his job, > >> whatever, > >> but he's the primary benefactor. > >> > >> With LLM? Company benefits first. And the dude may even loose his job > >> because of > >> LLM. And I want for people first to benefit from my work - not > >> corporations. > >> > >> Also LLM makes you dumber. Especially if you are learning. I use LLM > >> sometimes > >> as search engine or example generator. But even with that, I can feel my > >> brain > >> getting lazy and poking me to use LLM for that quick solution. From one > >> point > >> it's cool to get solution faster, but on the other hand, we will loose > >> ability > >> to solve problems on our own. > >> > >> I can see benefits of LLM. Like the time you guys used it to refactor > >> stm32 > >> source file to be more structured. Yeah, I think that's good use for LLM. > >> But > >> there are just much more bad use cases. > >> > >> Can't speak for anyone, but I avoid LLMs mainly for my and my brain's > >> sake. I > >> believe LLM will cause more harm than good. Especially in the future, when > >> experienced programmers pre-llm era will start to die out. > >> > > >
