Yes, this is why I started saying it was already discussed. I think adding the option to disable LIBC_LONG_LONG and TIME64 doesn't necessarily make NuttX POSIX-noncompliant.
It could be not compliant to POSIX 2027, but it was compliant with POSIX 2003 for example. BR, Alan On Wed, Jul 8, 2026 at 11:49 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2026-07-08 15:06, Karel Kočí wrote: > > Hi > > > > My two cents: > > > > * Nobody is suggesting to break POSIX compatibility for everyone. > > Alan's > > suggestion is to have option to break it to reduce the size. > > If memory serves, that was discussed before and the prevalent opinion > was that even having such option makes NuttX POSIX-noncompliant. (And > therefore any such option is unacceptable.) >
