If you have a custom IL, then there will be some small changes (for the better), otherwise there's no user-visible differences.
-mbs On 8/31/07, Paul Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 to get it merged into trunk and baked. Sounds like good material > for a 1.2 release. Are there any incompatibilities introduced, i.e., > will someone's 1.1 setup work (without modification) in 1.2? > > -- Paul > > On 8/31/07, Maciej Szefler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > With 1.1 all spiced and cured, I'd like to merge BART branch into the > trunk. > > As a a reminder (its been a while) the BART branch is a refactor of the > > engine that provides several benefits: > > > > 1. Simplified integration -- in particular it is no longer necessary to > > start transactions in the IL in order to interface with ODE > > 2. Support for three different "invocation styles": Unreliable (the > simple, > > no tx no guarantees style), Reliable (transacted transport, useful for > > WS-RM, JMS, and the like), and Transacted (supports atomic invocations). > > 3. Performance -- caching of instance state to eliminate unnecessary > > database reads, reuse of message objects in p2p invocations, elimination > of > > unnecessary transactions, elimination of unnecessary context switches ( > i.e . > > sequential instance work gets done by the same thread). > > > > Any objects, comments, suggestions are appreciated. > > > > -maciej > > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mult.ifario.us/ >
