On 21/11/2007, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 21, 2007 1:28 PM, Tammo van Lessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > cool, one thing vanished from my wish list. What about adding also the > > old value and being thus conform with bean-style change events? > > > > If there are no objections I volunteer to implement it - unless Matthieu > > has the files still open ;) > > > > They're all closed so feel free :) Unfortunately my editors were freaking out and closing too once I figured that its not that trivial to introduce that ;)
For the record: As it is not necessarily required and the information could be also derived from the audit trail, we'll leave it at the newValue attribute unless somebody file a bug on that. Cheers, Tammo -- Tammo van Lessen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.taval.de
