oh, thank you for the news. I was about to evaluate how ODE and Sandesha could be integrated. (see ODE-275<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODE-275> ) I will try to have a look at Mercury also then.
Alexis On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 7:57 AM, Jens Goldhammer < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > unfortunately I have seen that ws-rm through sandesha-module will not > be enhanced in future. The programmers of WSO2 have developed a new > module Mercury (http://wso2.org/projects/commons/mercury) which will > replace Sandesha2 in near future. > Maybe there is somebody who tries to integrate Mercury additionally? > > Thanks, > Jens > > 2008/5/9 Tammo van Lessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > +1 for a release. > > > > I'd like to also backport ODE-82, ODE-163 and I hope that I can finish my > > work on the openjpa queries (ODE-133) > > > > Cheers, > > Tammo > > > > Matthieu Riou wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Alex Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> I think that's a good idea. > >>> > >>> It would be nice if we could, > >>> 1) Finish the HTTP binding support (ODE-250, ODE-274, ODE-278); Alexis > >>> has > >>> been sending a pretty steady stream of patches for this. > >>> 2) Add support for invocation handlers, to support WS-RM and other > >>> service > >>> invocation customizations (ODE-275) > >>> 3) Add configurable MEX timeout (ODE-276) > >>> > >>> These are relatively small enhancements that shouldn't impact the > release > >>> timeframe (isolated code changes, low risk). > >>> > >>> I'd also like to hear from others about their priority items, > especially > >>> critical bugs (if any). We need triage the 1.2 bug list a little bit > if > >>> we > >>> want to do a release by the end of the month. > >>> > >> > >> Yeah, I wanted to go over those tomorrow or Monday. > >> > >> Matthieu > >> > >> > >>> alex > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi guys, > >>>> > >>>> I think it's getting about time we make a new release. We have quite a > >>> > >>> few > >>>> > >>>> fixes and improvements in the 1.1 branch and an incremental release > >>>> would > >>>> probably be useful for a lot of people. Opinions? > >>>> > >>>> I'm currently working on an improved routing logic, the one we have > >>>> right > >>>> now works in most cases but also breaks in several corner cases. Being > >>>> able > >>>> to extend the routing would also be an interesting feature I think. > That > >>>> shouldn't take me much more than 2 weeks. > >>>> > >>>> So if everybody is fine with the idea of an incremental release, what > >>>> about > >>>> targeting May 26th for the first RC? > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Matthieu > >>>> > >> > > > > >
