Hi, Please find my comments inline. On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Paul Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On May 16, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Milinda Pathirage wrote: > >> [...] If we use Atom API, I think we can implement a API like Google Data >> API :). >> Frankly, I don't have any experience with pros and cons of these >> technologies. >> > > I don't know what Atom would do for us, and even if it does something, I > have a feeling that it's orthogonal to an AJAXy management console. (I can > see Atom as a way to publish a stream of events out of the engine, but we'd > need to either fix a presentation in (X)HTML or extend Atom.) > > Someone kick me if I'm not seeing something. > > [...] I think it's better we can first define the API in whatever the way >> (Web >> Services or REST) and then go for the UI. While defining API and implement >> it we can give a very basic level of Management interface by using >> currently >> available Web Service based API. Then we can identify the issues with the >> WS-* based API and also can discover more and more requirements. >> > > Let's get a list of features laid out that we can prioritize and rate for > difficulty; then we can think about API/UI to support them. > I think this approach will be better and I am +1 for that. Thanks Milinda > > -- Paul > -- http://mpathirage.com http://wso2.org "Oxygen for Web Service Developers" http://wsaxc.blogspot.com "Web Services With Axis2/C"
