On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Dietmar Wolz <[email protected]>wrote:
> We in the Eclipse Swordfish team http://www.eclipse.org/swordfish/ are > currently trying to > get ODE through the Eclipse Foundation's IP process (license and > intellectual property > checking, due diligence). This is the second planned usage of ODE in the > Eclipse Runtime > beside the Eclipse SMILA project. Jürgen Schumacher from SMILA removed > Jaxen and Saxon > dependencies from ODE - which is a prerequisite to get ODE through the > eclipse IP compliance > process due to some license issues with Jaxen and Saxon. Our problem is > that the eclipse IP > process only uses released software and ODE 1.2 cannot be used because of > the Jaxen and Saxon > dependencies and missing functionality. Back in October an ODE 2.0 beta was > thought doable > within "a week or two" - see below. We at Eclipse (Smila and Swordfish) > urgently need a beta release of > ODE 2.0. When can a beta be expected? Are there any plans for a trunk > release? > It would help us very much. > I'll try to make a decent build this week so people can start voting on it. Thanks, Matthieu > > Yours, Dr. Dietmar Wolz > > >I think it would be doable to release Ode 2.0 beta 1 from the trunk within > a week or two. > >What do others think about this? > > >alex > > >>On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:24 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Hi, > >>I'm currently trying to get ODE through the Eclipse Foundation's IP > process (license and intellectual property > >>checking, due diligence) to be able to use in the Eclipse SMILA project, > which is usually no problem with Apache > >>software. However, we need the current trunk snapshot because we use > extension activities. Unfortunately, they > >>would like to avoid checking snapshot versions. So I would like to ask > (yes, again, sorry for bothering) if there are > >>any plans for a trunk release. I would help us very much. Thank you very > much for your patience. > >>Yours, Jürgen Schumacher > >
