On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Alex Boisvert <[email protected]> wrote:

> (I dropped [email protected])
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Nowakowski, Mateusz <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I've written similar mail some time ago, but this one covers the subject
> > in more detail.
> >
> > ODE 1.3.x is based on:
> >
> > 1) lib\saxon-9.x.jar
> > Which version is it exactly? Is it possible to change this dependency to
> > the most current version? With concrete version number.
>
>
> Karthick?
>
> 2) lib\openjpa-1.3.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> > This version depends on the time smb builds ODE.
> > What is more the version is "not blessed"  and it may disqualify ODE for
> > production purposes. Even if it is not used for some scenarios, it is
> > hard to explain bosses that ODE is predictable and safe.
> >
> > Is there any concrete reason why this version is used? (in ODE 1.2 it was
> > openjpa-1.1.0).
> >
> > Is it possible to fallback this dependency to openjpa-1.2.1? (most
> current
> > "blessed" version)
>
>
> It was due to a bug in openjpa-1.2.0.  I don't have the details right now.
> Matthieu would know best.
>

Yeah, I don't remember what exactly but 1.2.0 was broken for us. I haven't
tried 1.2.1, it probably include the fixes that made 1.3 work for us so I
would give it a try.

Matthieu


>
> We upgraded to 1.3.0-SNAPTSHOT since it was expected this was going to be
> the next release.   And then 1.2.1 was released.  So I think we should use
> 1.2.1 unless the issue hasn't been fixed in that version.
>
>
>
>
> > 3) lib\axion-1.0-M3-dev.jar
> > On Axion page http://axion.tigris.org/releases/1.0M3/release-notes.html
> > is said that "There is no official 1.0 Milestone 3 release of Axion" and
> > this version is a development version as well.
> > So there is a similar risk as for openjpa snapshot version.
> > So my question is: is it possible to get rid of this dependency somehow?
> > Is axion used for anything?
>
>
> No, AFAIK.  We had a similar discussion a while back...
> http://markmail.org/message/4l4a6ldnw6hq3zyl
>
> I'll nuke it.
>
> alex
>

Reply via email to