Looks like a good point for improvements. I'm not sure about copyright. It's not one of standard licenses, but it's open source. So it looks like we can use it.
On 13 May 2010 09:35, David Carver <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm looking through some of the various XML unit tests, and notice that none > are leveraging the XMLUnit test suite. There are some advantages for using > this test suite when looking at the result of the XML that is returned and > comparing differences on DOMs and XML serialization. > > Is there any particular reason that XML Unit isn't leveraged? Does it need > to go through an IP review in order to be used? > > http://xmlunit.sourceforge.net/ > > Dave > > > This is license for XMLUnit 1.3: /* ****************************************************************** Copyright (c) 2001-2009, Jeff Martin, Tim Bacon All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. * Neither the name of the xmlunit.sourceforge.net nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. ****************************************************************** */ -- Regards, Rafał Rusin
