Which suggestion ? I haven't seen much discussion. It sounds like a major incompatible change for OpenJPA users. What's the benefit ? Can the two schema be exactly the same or not ?
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 17:07, Jeff Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi team, > > This is a follow-up vote for the Rafal's suggestion, which is to try to make > JPA implementation's table schema is as same as possible with the > dao-hibernate module db schema. > This means it would cause users who use OpenJPA will have the db schema > changes dramatically from the 1.3.5 release, in the other hand, the > Hibernate users might just need > to do some small schema update when switching it from native Hibernate to > the JPA Hibernate implementation. > > So I think we need an vote here. > > Personally, I'd like to have one static schema, given a lot of users choose > hibernate, here is my +1. > > Regards > Jeff > > -- > Cheers, > Jeff Yu > > ---------------- > blog: http://jeff.familyyu.net > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
