[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473395
]
Si Chen commented on OFBIZ-309:
-------------------------------
It would be nice to get their feedback of course, but I cannot imagine how this
could be an intentional design.
> If a service is implemented as an interface, its settings for optional
> attributes are ignored!
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-309
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-309
> Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: framework
> Affects Versions: SVN trunk
> Reporter: Leon Torres
> Assigned To: Si Chen
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: services.patch
>
>
> This is bad:
> If a service has some attributes with optional="false" and is implemented
> with <implements service="">, the settings for optional are ignored and
> default to "true" instead.
> As an example, look up the service definition for upsRateEstimate in
> webtools and compare to the service that it implements,
> calcShipmentEstimateInterface. The interface defines a few optional fields
> as false, which show up correctly for calcShipmentEstimateInterface but are
> all set to true in upsRateEstimate.
> It used to work, something must have broken it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
