Re: Use of Form Widget in ecommerce webapp

[Tim Ruppert]

Al, I know that Andrew used a dojo-based tree widget on the CMS updates, but I'm not sure if that's a long term upgrade for the Tree Widget. I would start here on the Dojo use - but you can also check into the quick anonymous checkout process for other examples.

Cheers
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595


On Feb 26, 2007, at 11:25 PM, Al Byers wrote:

David,

As you know, since we just emailed, that was me.


of DoJo use within OFBiz?

-Al

On 2/26/07, David E. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I am wondering if the DoJo tree widget would be the best thing to replace the TreeWidget that was used in the widget-based blog elements? Can anyone who is looking into the use of DoJo comment on that? Is the tree widget being used anywhere else? Where is the best place to be looking for examples

Just so it's clear to everyone: the use of the form widget has been
banned for the ecommerce webapp since the day the form widget was
conceived.

It looks like this was recently violated with the forms in the
BlogForms.xml file.

I'm posting this to the mailing list just to make it clear that this
isn't okay because it makes it difficult to get the exact web design
desired in customer/public facing webapp. So, I'm asking committers
to watch out for this and not commit any code that used the Form
Widget in the ecommerce webapp.

As for this code, hopefully someone will replace it soon with FTL
files. Chances are as soon as these are used on a major blog site
this will have to happen anyway. Just an FYI: at Hotwax me might
actually have a client need for this soon, so hopefully if no one


-David

beats us to it we'll get it taken care of in the next couple of months.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature