In Rev. 499029 the simple-methods.xsd was changed to make field-name a required attribute of <calcops/>. Was this done on purpose? There are quite a few uses that only use the following definition style <calcop operator="add"> <calcop field-name="myField1" operator="get"/> <calcop field-name="myField2" operator="get"/> </calcop>
- Rev 499029 calcops field required? Chris Howe
- Re: Rev 499029 calcops field required? Scott Gray
- Re: Rev 499029 calcops field required? Jacques Le Roux
- Re: Rev 499029 calcops field required? David E. Jones
- Re: Rev 499029 calcops field required? Jacques Le Roux
