David E. Jones wrote:
The initial draft of the board report is available here:
http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/XgU
As an adjunct to that and as someone looking forward to a stable release, is the
naming convention for the release mentioned in the report put to bed?
<opening can of worms>
Will it be
Apache OFBiz 4.0
Apache OFBiz 7.04
Apache OFBiz 4_STABLE
Apache OFBiz 4_RELEASE
</opening can of worms>
Coming from a OS (FreeBSD) that has development that works identical to this
project (continual, not completely dependent upon upstream
engineering/packaging), I like the _RELEASE style naming convention. I'd even
suggest we have some sort of patch nomenclature, so that all the security
patches applied to the release version be visible from a running instance, and
be [ documented | easy linked from the home page] as to what is fixed for each
patch.
Okay this is getting long.
Does this need to be a jira issue?
--
Walter
