Some very quick screenshots: http://docs.ofbiz.org/download/attachments/1218/clarity_studio.pdf
I have shown a very small part of the Clarity customization screens. The customization concept in Clarity is very powerful, but the actual implementation has bad usability issues that need resolving. I would be happy to help by putting together a requirements document for ofbiz for this proposed work to show screens for editing entities, screens, forms, etc. On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 23:56 -0700, Chris Howe wrote: > Screenshots would be great. Thanks! > > --- Christopher Snow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think this is a great idea. I use the Clarity CA toolset that does > > what your proposing and they use it as a big sales feature. It > > allows > > functional (not technical) not technical consultants to customize the > > application. > > > > Would some screenshots be useful as an example? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Chris > > > > > > On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 20:09 -0700, Chris Howe wrote: > > > There was some talk a while back about creating an Eclipse plugin > > for > > > OFBiz. How is that effort coming along? I ask because it is > > becoming > > > easier and easier to use rich AJAX tools inside OFBiz that it may > > be > > > within reach and reason to talk about creating a web application to > > > develop OFBiz applications. > > > > > > The benefit of an eclipse tool would be the ability to jump from > > say a > > > screen to a referenced location. That seems like a rather straight > > > forward task from a web application. Freemarker makes it rather > > simple > > > to arrange an xml source so that you could focus on particular > > aspects > > > of development. The only thing that I'm seeing that might make it > > > difficult is the ability to load/unload services and components on > > the > > > fly. > > > > > > What does the community think? Does the content manager tackle > > some of > > > this? Would a ofbiz.home/development be appropriate? Is this a > > much > > > larger task than it appears? Is there any interest? > > > > > > > > >
