David, There has been a confusion in the calculate's field-name attribute modification in rev. 514617. This correction was intended to correct calcop operation's field-name attribute wich was finally correctly corrected in rev. 523001
Here are the respective comments for 514617 and 523001. "Changed to represent the fact that calcop -> field-name is optional; reported by Chris Howe" "Changed the calcop element's field-name attribute to NOT be required; this must be another casualty of recent cleanups or something" So now a part of the 514617 change should be reverted in respect of rev. 490457 (ie : field-name is required for calculate operation but the annotation change is to be kept, I hope to be clear at this stage). I saw somewhere (from St Louis video or on Contegix site) that using Fisheye to monitor a svn repository is a good thing to do. I also saw on infra ML the link http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/ in the thread "Re: Fisheye for Apache Geronimo?" So my question : may the PMC asks to have OFBiz repository under supervision of Fisheye ? BTW if needed, I have asked some time ago for a free Fisheye licence and Cenqua guys gave me one. I never found the time to investigate more. But If there are infra ressources available we might take advantage of them. I also profit from it for asking if you think it's would not be a good thing to commit my last patch (simple-methods.xsd.patch (73 kb)) in http://tinyurl.com/2u7dvh ? I will then be happy to finish the work about the XSL transform and afterward to update http://tinyurl.com/3dzwnb. This page could then be moved to wiki's "official" part. I also considered to change the file name to mini-language.xsd as it contains also map-processor tags. But I'm not sure of other implications than changing references in code and in wiki page above ? I would like to do the same type of work for the widgets, what do you think ? Jacques
