Yes sounds cool, +1 Jacques
----- Message d'origine ----- De : "Adrian Crum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : <[email protected]> Envoyé : lundi 2 avril 2007 22:44 Objet : Re: widgets in widget-screen.xsd; minOccurs > +1 > > I agree that it would be nice to be able to invoke actions without having to > create a widget section. > > > Chris Howe wrote: > > This is trivial, but I was curious why the widgets element isn't set to > > minOccurs="0" > > > > having <widgets/> is valid and is rendered as expected. So, can we > > change the xsd so that omitting it altogether from a screen definition > > should be allowed as well? > > > > <xs:element name="section" substitutionGroup="AllWidgets"> > > <xs:complexType> > > <xs:sequence> > > <xs:element minOccurs="0" ref="condition"/> > > <xs:element minOccurs="0" ref="actions"/> > > <xs:element ref="widgets"/> > > <xs:element minOccurs="0" ref="fail-widgets"/> > > </xs:sequence> > > <xs:attributeGroup ref="attlist.section"/> > > </xs:complexType> > > </xs:element> > >
