The jira url: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1235
2007/9/12, guo weizhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi Jonathon, > > What I need is like the struts2 integrate with dojo, when you want to use > the AJAX function just add " theme='ajax' " in the form elements. > and then the form have the AJAX function like submit it without refresh > all page, auto validation the input, make the table pages AJAXed and so on. > > I will create JIRA for this, and waiting for your contribute:) > > Thank you! > > Jack Guo > > 2007/9/12, Jonathon -- Improov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Hi Jack, > > > > I integrated the AJAX aspects of Dojo into the Widget Engine. Haven't > > done much with the Dojo widgets. > > > > Check out the Form Widget elements like <field> and attributes like > > "action", the ideas are there. > > At the simplest level, my integration merely makes it unnecessary for > > you to write any javascript > > codes to do AJAX, that's all. > > > > There are also several extensions that have more to do with javascript > > than with Dojo. As we get > > more and more common javascript chunks showing up, we can also abstract > > those into the Widget Engine. > > > > Hope you understand my rough illustration of my integration strategy. No > > rocket science, as you > > can see. > > > > Rather than have me dump to you my assorted toolsets, why don't you > > specify on JIRA exactly what > > you need to get done with Dojo and Widget Engine? I'll submit small and > > self-contained patches to > > address specific needs. Cleaner that way, and easier to merge into OFBiz > > SVN. > > > > So is Dojo to chosen toolkit? I'd vote for it, since it already is in > > OFBiz SVN. > > > > Jonathon > > > > guo weizhan wrote: > > > Hi Jonathon, > > > > > > How do you built dojo into the Widget Engine? Is there any code I can > > reuse? > > > > > > And I think Dojo it's powerfull, I like dojo to deal js as the div. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Jack Guo > > > > > > > > > 2007/9/12, Jonathon -- Improov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> Al, > > >> > > >> I had built Dojo into the Widget Engine already, in one of my own > > private > > >> implementations. (Beyond > > >> that, I had also done several nifty AJAX stuff in Widget Engine, like > > >> making the next/prev buttons > > >> AJAXed). > > >> > > >> The exercise has told me that integrating any other javascript > > toolkit > > >> into the Widget Engine will > > >> follow similar lines. I have the distinct feeling that the Widget > > Engine > > >> can be built to support > > >> more than 1 toolkit! > > >> > > >> Let me know which toolkit wins your votes, and I'll see if I can kick > > > > >> start the integration exercise. > > >> > > >> Jonathon > > >> > > >> Al Byers wrote: > > >>> Where did we leave the javascript toolkit debate? Googling does not > > show > > >> any > > >>> clear cut direction. > > >>> > > >>> I have a question about Prototype. Does it have layout widgets like > > Dojo > > >>> (eg. TabContainer, SplitContainer, AccordianContainer)? I don't see > > them > > >> in > > >>> the API for Prototype. > > >>> > > >>> I think we need to make a choice primarily because it will be > > possible > > >> to > > >>> integrate a toolkit with the screen widget technology and it won't > > be > > >>> practical to do more than one. Right now I feel comfortable with > > Dojo as > > >> the > > >>> primary js toolkit, but that could be because I am not familiar with > > >> others. > > >>> I like the strong layout widgets that Dojo has and it seems to have > > >>> everything else, too, and I don't think that is a bad thing. I am > > able > > >> to do > > >>> a file upload within Dojo and get a JSON response and I think that > > is an > > >>> important consideration. I have read that Dojo is more Java, workman > > > > >> like > > >>> and Prototype is more Ruby and elegant. If that is the case, I would > > opt > > >> for > > >>> Dojo. > > >>> > > >>> If nothing else, it might be useful to use this thread to measure > > where > > >> the > > >>> community's interest lies. So respond with nothing more than a vote > > if > > >> you > > >>> care to. > > >>> > > >>> -Al > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >>> > > >>> No virus found in this incoming message. > > >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > >>> Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.14/999 - Release Date: > > >> 9/10/2007 5:43 PM > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > > Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.15/1002 - Release Date: > > 9/11/2007 5:46 PM > > > > >
