I tried to edit the the "main new features of  the month" (aka. 
http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/-Qs).

I beginned by adding a point about the new for widgets examples in the Example 
component ("Examples of widget usages have been
added")

Then I decided to group by themes using head styles.
After an hour, I finally ended with http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/Kww. Now I'm not 
sure that it's better (easier to read and maintain)
than the original.
It's surely easier to edit (less "*" everywhere) in a *real editor* (I use 
Scite for Wiki Markups, Confluence drives me creasy) than
the original, but easier to read ?

WDYTF (What Do You Think Folks) ?

Jacques

De : "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I think there is some ASF infra stuff for periodic automated builds,
> and if we do this we should definitely get something automated setup
> to reduce long term effort required...
>
> -David
>
>
> On Oct 20, 2007, at 9:06 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
>
> > Sounds good to me although I'm a bit short on time lately to help
> > out with
> > it, are there any Apache protocols we need to be aware of?
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > On 20/10/2007, Jacopo Cappellato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> It seems that the original thread has been hijacked by the Linux
> >> enthusiasts :-) so I'm restarting it now from here.
> >>
> >> Here is the content of the original message:
> >>
> >> I think that we should provide an easy way to download (by ftp) a
> >> compressed archive to the ones that are just interested in evaluating
> >> the product. *Minimal* prerequisites should be necessary to
> >> download and
> >> run OFBiz in this way so that users with a low bandwidth
> >> connection to
> >> the Internet, and running on a box with Jdk 1.5 installed would be
> >> able
> >> to download (possibly in multiple chunks) a compressed archive,
> >> unpack
> >> it and run "ant run-install".
> >>
> >> Of course, as soon as the version 4.0 will be officially released,
> >> they
> >> will have a file to download; however I don't think that the
> >> release 4.0
> >> will be the right version to consider for an evaluation... the
> >> trunk is
> >> the best option and we should encourage people to see it in action.
> >>
> >> A simple solution is this: create a weekly or, better (as
> >> suggested by
> >> Jacques), monthly svn snapshot (svn export), then compress it and
> >> publish it somewhere in a very visible area of the main page of the
> >> website; we could also provide a link to the "main new features of
> >> the
> >> month" (e.g. http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/-Qs).
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >>
> >> Jacopo
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to