De : "BJ Freeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > thanks for your input. > please note: I am not moving or adding any setup files from were they are. > I am only creating a menu and links in one place so they are easily found. > there is one selection that sets the webapp to hide the tab once all > setup is done. > it also has it own security so only the configuration person should > access this tab.
Yes, great idea ! +1 Jacques > > Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 11/3/2007 3:26 PM: > > De : "BJ Freeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Ok got these Configuration files pulled from the applications in my web > >> tools. > >> Was going to put them in SVN till it dawned on me that there is not > >> suppose to be any dependency. > >> now I notice the setting the Timeperiods for Fiscal is in Webtools and > >> it has it own page in Webtools. > >> Since this effects a application, does this not break the dependency rule? > > > > Yes, sounds like it does > > > >> So do we want to have another app in the applications that does Setup so > >> there is only one pages to maintain or make seperate pages like > >> timeperiods in Webtools? > > > > Yes setting applications parameters outside of framework sound really > > better. I already wondered why "Timeperiods for Fiscal" is not > > in the accouting application. > > > >> The Setup would mostly be a controller that includes all the apps > >> controllers and a menu for selecting the setup pages throughout the > >> applications. > >> and example of a setup page is the Emails for productstores. > > > > I'm not sure that we need another webtools like page for setting > > applications parameters.They should be contained in their > > respective applications > > > > WFIW > > > > Jacques > > > > > > > > >
