three catagories so far, Each of these can be multiple.
Address types: Highrise, Residential, Business,etc these are defined by
USPS in thier address DB.

Status of Address: Verified, Unknown, Linkedvalid, linkinvalid

Address Usablity: Deliverable, Check shipper, Unknown -- these would
depend on a shipper.

There is only one physical address
however someone may move, or it maybe specified in more that one Contact
mech but have a differet ID.

part of the Address verification is to go through on a regular bases and
match different postalAddress and to link the ones that match.

It a maybe is is valid or it may not.

David E Jones sent the following on 11/3/2007 8:05 PM:
> On Nov 3, 2007, at 6:10 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
> 
>> Like to create a postalcodeAttributes and PostCodeAttrType enitities
>> these woulld be used with the Address correction.
>> Like Highrise, Verified, Deliverable, checkshipper
>>
>> pretty much a catch all to conditions and types of addresses.
>>
>> any suggestions or approval.
> 
> The type/attribute pattern is not meant to be used for anything that can
> be planned for in advance. Also, they should only on top-level entities,
> not those like PostalAddress which is really a type of ContactMech (so,
> ContactMech is the top-level entity and PostalAddress is a subsidiary).
> 
> In any case the type/attribute pattern is not what you're looking for,
> because it sounds like you know in advance what the data elements are
> (and not at run-time or in some emergency where you can't change the
> database in a reasonable amount of time).
> 
> The best way to approach it is to make a list of data elements (with a
> definition for each) that you can't find in the data model and then we
> can discuss entities and fields that already exist that might cover
> them, or make proposals about new fields (or entities if necessary). The
> best way to decide where to put fields, BTW, is to look at the
> cardinality relative to existing entities (for example is there one per
> Party, or one per ContactMech, or maybe not applicable to ContactMech
> but only to the sub-type of PostalAddress, etc).
> 
> -David
> 
> 

Reply via email to