Yes I agree no hurry for now... (and less work Adrian ;o)

Jacques

De : "Tim Ruppert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You know me - a fan of backward compatibility.  I'd say unless there's  
> a super compelling reason - like there really aren't any JPublish fans  
> out there (if you're out there - twould be great if you could give us  
> a holler) - then I'd say just leave it in.
> 
> Cheers,
> Tim
> --
> Tim Ruppert
> HotWax Media
> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
> 
> o:801.649.6594
> f:801.649.6595
> 
> 
> On Nov 17, 2007, at 5:47 PM, David E Jones wrote:
> 
> >
> > The intent has been to leave this for those who are really into  
> > JPublish, or if there is an update to the project so we can make it  
> > available again. In other words, there are certain JPublish fans out  
> > there who might want to use it even though it's not a best practice  
> > for OFBiz.
> >
> > We could toss it and let people get it out of an old SVN revision...
> >
> > Does anyone have strong feelings about this?
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
> > On Nov 17, 2007, at 2:17 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Adrian
> >>
> >> http://www.nabble.com/ofbiz-screen-widget-v.-jpublish-tf4103795.html#a11685657
> >>
> >> I think you could safely remove them if you were so inclined.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Scott
> >>
> >> On 16/11/2007, Adrian Crum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I noticed there are a lot of JPublish rendering classes in the
> >>> framework/webapp component. Are we
> >>> still developing for JPublish?
> >>>
> >>> -Adrian
> >
> 
> 

Reply via email to