De : "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > It wouldn't be appropriate for me to make that decision, and I don't > really have a strong opinion on it either way. > > That would be consistent with these other things so we certainly could > do it that way. > > We should solicit opinions on it, but that should really happen on the > dev list. > > In fact, this whole thread should probably have been on the dev list... > > -David
Yes, I agree. I wanted to make it well known, done :o) Jacques > > On Nov 21, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: > > > David, > > > > Your reply got me to thinking... should we have screen widget > > boundary comments turned ON by default? > > > > -Adrian > > > > David E Jones wrote: > > > >> The general practice (kind of policy...) for SVN is that everything > >> in it should be development oriented. When you check out from SVN, > >> you get a set of configuration values that put timeouts on caches > >> for auto- reloading, and so on. > >> This is why we have production setup documentation, namely: > >> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/Apache+OFBiz+Technical+Production+Setup+Guide > >> > >> What should be done in this case is have it OFF by default, and > >> make sure it is documented in the above mentioned document. > >> This is the practice with everything else, and should be the > >> practice with this. > >> -David > >> On Nov 21, 2007, at 12:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> I think it should be on by default. It doesnt hurt anything and the > >>> javascript compression work I have seen suggests that it helps. > >>> If you are > >>> trying to debug, which would be the only time it would be needed > >>> that I can > >>> see, you can turn it on. > >>> > >>> My two cents. > >>> > >>> Skip > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Adrian Crum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 10:17 AM > >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Subject: Re: compressHTML ON by default ? > >>> > >>> > >>> Just so everyone one knows what compressHTML does: > >>> > >>> It strips unnecessary whitespace from the HTML output. It is NOT > >>> the same > >>> thing as gzipped HTTP 1.1 > >>> compression. > >>> > >>> I originally proposed the compressHTML feature to help reduce the > >>> amount of > >>> markup travelling over > >>> dial-up lines. At the time there was some debate as to whether it > >>> would > >>> produce any noticable > >>> difference - that's why it is OFF by default. > >>> > >>> -Adrian > >>> > >>> Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> I commited recently (in trunk revision: 594042) a patch from > >>>> Adrian. I > >>> > >>> then asked in the corresponding Jira issue > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1318 > >>> > >>>> > >>>> <<I just wondered if we should not use the compressHTML by > >>>> default (ON) > >>> > >>> from a property in general.properties ?>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> I know it's very minor, but maybe we should, WDYT ? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> > >>>> Jacques > >>>> > >>> > >>> > > > >
