Also for beginners we have this advice in FAQ...
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/FAQ+-+Tips+-+Tricks+-+Cookbook+-+HowTo#FAQ-Tips-Tricks-Cookbook-HowTo-obsolete
Jacques
Le 11/08/2017 à 17:21, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Nicolas, All,
Nicolas: are you speaking about deleteProductionRunRoutingTask (OFBIZ-9568),
deleteWorkEffort (OFBIZ-9185) or both ?
I think you answered only about deleteWorkEffort and then I agree.
I was also reluctant to remove it. But then we need to define what would be
it's minimal implementation.
Because as Deepak said, when you want to delete a workeffort with relations with other entities (hence FKs); then you need to delete those other
entities before.
And in some case it can be quite hard (I try to generalise from this case).
I wonder if a new simpler service like deleteSimpleWorkeffort would not be appropriate. A simple workEffort would not have any relations with any
entities, else the call would be rejected by this new service.
Because generalising seems hard, even more when considering all entities, like
eg OrderHeader
see
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBENDUSER/How+to+delete+tuples+added+to+test+a+setup
and also related thread https://s.apache.org/DCiI
This time I want to get to some action :D
Jacques
Le 11/08/2017 à 11:20, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
Hello Jacques,
It's a good example why I explained that delete is interesting in some cases.
We implemented a process with template workeffort where an operator create a production run from the templating and delete some task that is not
needed before start. In this context, I have no reason to keep these workeffort on the database.
I'm in favor to keep these services as simple as possible and in coherence with the create service with information that the delete service doesn't
manage all foreign key and we need prepare the delete before. For all other case, expire will own friend :)
Nicolas
Le 10/08/2017 à 11:56, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
Please give your opinion on OFBIZ-9568 before I continue on OFBIZ-9185
Thanks
Jacques