Re: Different main/test directory layouts for framework and applications/plugins?

[Michael Brohl]

Thanks Taher,

sorry, I had a typo in my description. Of course I have src/test/java.



Best regards,

Michael


Am 08.09.17 um 15:17 schrieb Taher Alkhateeb:

Thanks for the confirmation that framework, apps and plugins are all treated the same, there mus be a problem on my side then.

Hi Michael,

The layouts are exactly the same between all components whether be it
in framework, applications or plugins. Adding a directory called
/src/test/java is _optional_. If you create a directory like that and
place java files in it, then any junit "@Test" will run automatically.
Check the start or base components for some references.

Also, again to reiterate, it is /src/test/java, not /src/main/test

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Michael Brohl <michael.br...@ecomify.de> wrote:

Hi everyone,

I just stumbled about the fact that we have different directory structures
for main and test code between framework and applications/plugins.

In framework, we have a structure

    src/main/java

    src/main/test

In applications and plugins, we only have

    src/main/java


The test classes for apps/plugins are in /test subfolders for each
app/plugin.

I tried to use the framework layout for a custom plugin and found that the
test classes are not recognized then (ClassNotFoundException). I guess that
src/main/test is not recognized by the class loader for apps/plugins.


Can someone confirm this?

Is this a flaw or is there a reason behind the different layouts?


I think it would be good to have the same layout throughout the code. If
someone can point me to the right spot, I would be happy to work on this.


Thanks and best regards,

Michael

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature